Some people need a “shark” during divorce, while others don’t

When it comes to choosing legal representation in the wake of a decision to get divorced, many people believe they need to hire a “shark.” A “shark” refers to an aggressive, no-holds-barred attorney who will fight tooth and nail to secure the best possible outcome. 

While this type of lawyer may be necessary in certain situations, not every divorce requires such a combative approach. Understanding when a shark-like approach from an attorney capable of employing a variety of approaches depending on a client’s unique situation can be beneficial and when a more cooperative strategy is appropriate can help divorcing individuals make informed decisions about their legal representation.

When hiring a “shark” may work to your benefit

If you are divorcing, a “shark” attorney may be exactly what you need. Your situation may involve high levels of conflict, complex assets or your spouse may be truly uncooperative and/or manipulative. If so, a tough attorney may be required to protect your interests. For example, if a spouse is trying to hide assets, refuses to negotiate or uses intimidation tactics, a tough, aggressive approach can help ensure you receive a fair share of your marital assets and protect your legal rights.

Also, if your spouse is also your child’s other parent, and they are unfit or pose a danger to your child, an aggressive approach may be needed to secure sole or primary custody. In child custody cases, a “shark” attorney can help present evidence of neglect, abuse or other issues to ensure that children’s best interests are protected.

When a less intense approach may be preferable 

While aggressive attorneys are useful in contentious divorces, they are not always the best option for every case. Many divorces can be settled through a more cooperative approach, especially when both parties are willing to work together to resolve issues amicably. Mediation and other collaborative divorce processes allow both spouses to work together with the help of their attorneys to reach mutually beneficial agreements. This can save time, reduce stress, and minimize the financial costs of the divorce.

Hiring an aggressive attorney can be expensive, as they often engage in prolonged litigation and confrontational tactics. If you and your spouse can reach agreements without aggressive legal battles, a more cooperative approach can potentially save you both time and money.

Making a choice 

While some divorce scenarios may require the services of an aggressive attorney to protect your interests, others may benefit from a more cooperative and amicable approach. The key is to evaluate the specifics of your situation and choose the legal approach that best fits your needs.